|
is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization Established in 1998.
HONConduct117679 . Site Contents Updated: October 21, 2008
"The information provided on this site is designed to support, not to replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician." This site does not host nor accept funding from advertising nor is it part of any web ring.
This page and all sub-pages are the sole and
exclusive property of the National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation (NTEF).
The NTEF claims worldwide copyright of this site. Any unauthorized copying
or reproduction is a breach of our intellectual rights and will be prosecuted
accordingly, if violated.
Copyrighted 1998-2008
|
|
|||
|
NTEF Response to Clarins Response |
||||
|
The legal term "ad hominem" is applicable to Clarins response, as the Latin phrase suggests, an "argument against the person" (and not against the ideas he or she is presenting). When you can not defend yourself you go after the person. Clarins can not DISPROVE the NTEF's allegations and therefore, are looking for a "reason" to vindicate themselves. The products by Clarins own admission thru court documents can not prove the safety of their product, when in fact, they proved that Angel DOES DAMAGE the eyes, intentionally skewed their dermal testing, falsified MSDS sheets that were discredited by the plaintiff. This company uses deceptive advertising and marketing phrases to entice the public to buy their products.
They have yet to address any of the numerous press releases
regarding their wanton violation of US federal labeling laws.
The salient fact is that Clarins can not disprove anything
the NTEF has claimed and is refusing to provide
documentation of their so called safety testing.
Christian Courtin-Clarins, we will again solicit your
personal appearance with your Director of Research to meet
with our experts to prove you are in fact natural and
botanically based.
If their products are what they say they are, Clarins should not
have any problem in a face to face discussion with the press
present and have our documented allegations refuted by their so
called "science". Until such time, silence or non-production of
laboratory testing for their toxic products will remain as such
and will be brought to the attention of the United States
Federal Government to determine who is right, the NTEF or the
foreign entity seeking corporate profits.
The lawsuit had nothing to do with the foundation, as the
foundation was established in 1998, well in advance of their
assault in 2002.
The law is on the side of the NTEF as highly documented and
elucidated in the first petition filed. This is one of many on
the myriad of discrepancies our team has discovered and will
present to the federal government.
Clarins where is your proof that your Stretch Mark product is
not affecting the developing fetus (2nd and 3rd trimester) and
will not manifest itself in any neuro-developmental problems in
later years? You can't as you have nothing that we know of
confirming the safety of this product either in utero or animal
studies, since you claim to not use animal testing. How many
pregnant women were in your study group and did you pre-screen
them, if so, then as usual your testing is skewed and invalid as
a random independent sample group. Where is the maternal blood
work and fetal cord blood work up at birth for this product? We
highly doubt that you were competent enough to do such a
complete work up regarding this products safety, if we are
wrong, please provide said testing.
The smoke and mirror campaign that Clarins is using will cease
and it will be by the hand of the US Federal Government
regulatory agency/agencies.
"Toilet water was meant to be FLUSHED not WORN" -Angel De Fazio "Homeostasis can not be maintained by the chronic and intentional assault of toxic chemicals in our environment" -NTEF E-Mail Angel Directly
|
|
|||
National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation
